Category Archives: Klippingi

Ukinjanje kulture na Madžarskem

The ‘patriotic’ culture war being waged by the government may force the closure of one of Hungary’s leading arts academies

George Szirtes

Tuesday 6 August 2013


The UK has culture skirmishes; Hungary has culture wars. In a country where party politics has always sought to control the cultural field, the aim of such war is to wipe out, or at least quarantine, the opposition, its ideology, its language, its notions of independence, and – in the case of the current administration – to impose an all-consuming patriotic line whereby only one version of Hungary is allowed to exist.


There is currently the case with the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. The original academy was founded in 1825, chiefly composed of scientists but including some literary figures. In 1949 it was taken over by the Communist party, so after 1989, there was reason to change it again. The academy declared itself an autonomous institution and in 1992 the Széchenyi Academy of Letters and Arts, or Szima was founded as one of its branches. As soon as news of its foundation got around, it was attacked by the right wing and a rival organisation, the Hungarian Academy of the Arts, or MMA was set up, forestalling it by a few months, with the architect Imre Makovecz at the head. Szima invited members, MMA took them on application.


Szima had, and continues to have, the finest writers of the period, including Hungary’s four leading novelists, Péter Esterházy, Peter Nádas, Imre Kertész, and László Krasznahorkai, as well as its greatest film directors, Zoltán Fábri, Miklós Jancsó, Károly Makk, Márta Mészáros and István Szabó, not to mention composer György Kurtág and pianist Zoltán Kocsis. MMA has a good many artists who applied. But MMA got the money.


From the “patriotic” point of view, any art that questions the administration’s values or simply negates them is to be distrusted. But since Hungary is still a democratic country the government can’t be seen to censor disagreeable material directly. It can’t arrest or ban people but it can jettison them and prevent them operating by strangling them financially or by taking over the organisation from the inside.


The list of such strangulations and takeovers is already long. In theatre the ousting of artistic directors and the installation of far-right figures; in the visual arts theencouragement of rightwing art through national competitions and the amalgamation of independent galleries to single institutions more easily controlled by government; in media the attempts to close down independent radio stations. The list in literature is far too long already. There have been attempts to smear György Konrád and to deprive Nobel prizewinner Imre Kertész of his Hungarian identity (now referred to only as being “of Hungarian extraction”).


There has been the setting up of an expensive new national library to promote Hungarian patriotic values, and the introduction of fascist writers of the 30s and 40s to the school syllabus. Philosophers have been smeared. In March the prestigious Táncsics awards were given to three members of the far right – one of those awarded gave back the prize, under official pressure, the other two kept them. Far-right figures get research centres of their own, while the philosopher György Lukács’s research centre is broken up into general libraries.


Now MMA has been declared the only representative of Hungarian arts. MMA has a clear patriotic agenda. Szima is a non-political organisation and includes supporters of the government. Interestingly enough, the founder and leaders of MMA have been among those to traduce Konrád. A couple of months ago the architects association suggested a series of events to commemorate 20 years of Szima. Not only did it receive no funding, but the association is threatened with closure.


But maybe that is not surprising. István Klinghammer, the new secretary for higher education, recently declared: “I think the humanities are important but they don’t create values.” Not the right values perhaps.


Some will say it is just privileged artists moaning about loss of influence. But this is cumulative, part of a process to deprive the opposition of voice and therefore language. Hungary has produced great artists, musicians, architects, film directors and writers. Some of them are still alive. The government wishes to cut them out of the heart of culture. The truth is that the so-called “patriots” backed by the Fidesz conservative party are not the image of the nation: they want the nation to be the image of them.

If you have any questions about this email, please contact the user help desk: Copyright (c) Guardian News and Media Limited. 2013 Registered in England and Wales No. 908396 Registered office: PO Box 68164, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London N1P 2AP

Ameriški senator za Snowdna

Senator to Snowden: ‘You have done the right thing’

Published time: July 16, 2013 19:55
Edited time: July 17, 2013 08:57

Screenshot from YouTube video uploaded by FirstintheNationshow·Screenshot from YouTube video uploaded by FirstintheNationshow·


NSA leaksTags


While some current members of Congress continue to rally for the prosecution of National Security Agency leaker Edward Snowden, a long-serving United States senator has sent a letter of support to the NSA contractor-turned-whistleblower.

According to correspondence published Tuesday by the Guardian’s Glenn Greenwald, former two-term senator Gordon Humphrey (R-New Hampshire) wrote the exiled Mr. Snowden to say, “you have done the right thing in exposing what I regard as massive violation of the United States Constitution.”

Snowden, 30, is currently in Russia where he has applied for temporary asylum while he awaits assistance in traveling to one of the Latin American countries that have approved similar requests. He is wanted for espionage and other charges in the US after fleeing in May and providing Greenwald and other journalists with classified NSA documents detailing vast surveillance programs operated by the US government.

The US Department of Justice has asked Russia repeatedly to return Snowden to the US, and his revelations and conduct have caused commotion across Washington and the rest of the world. But while the administration of President Barack Obama continues to insist Snowden is sent back to the US to stand trial, Humphrey has words nowhere near as harsh.

“Having served in the United States Senate for twelve years as a member of the Foreign Relations Committee, the Armed Services Committee and the Judiciary Committee, I think I have a good grounding to reach my conclusion,” the former lawmaker wrote.

I wish you well in your efforts to secure asylum and encourage you to persevere,” Humphrey added.

When contacted by Greenwald for verification, Humphrey wrote a second letter, which has since been shared by the Guardian journalist.

Yes. It was I who sent the email message to Edward Snowden, thanking him for exposing astonishing violations of the US Constitution and encouraging him to persevere in the search for asylum,” Humphrey wrote Greenwald.

To my knowledge, Mr. Snowden has disclosed only the existence of a program and not details that would place any person in harm’s way. I regard him as a courageous whistleblower,” he continued.

I object to the monumentally disproportionate campaign being waged by the US government against Edward Snowden, while no effort is being made to identify, remove from office and bring to justice those officials who have abused power, seriously and repeatedly violating the Constitution of the United States and the rights of millions of unsuspecting citizens.”

Americans concerned about the growing arrogance of our government and its increasingly menacing nature should be working to help Mr. Snowden find asylum. Former Members of Congress, especially, should step forward and speak out,” he concluded.

In a letter sent in response from Snowden to the former senator, the NSA leaker thanked Humphrey and wrote, “I only wish more of our lawmakers shared your principles,” adding that “the actions I’ve taken would not have been necessary” had these conversations occurred years earlier on Capitol Hill.

The media has distorted my actions and intentions to distract from the substance of Constitutional violations and instead focus on personalities,” Snowden wrote. “It seems they believe every modern narrative requires a bad guy. Perhaps it does. Perhaps, in such times, loving one’s country means being hated by its government.”

If history proves that be so, I will not shy from that hatred,” he wrote. “I will not hesitate to wear those charges of villainy for the rest of my life as a civic duty, allowing those governing few who dared not do so themselves to use me as an excuse to right these wrongs.”

Snowden then went on to reaffirm allegations made previously by Greenwald that classified knowledge of government programs will continue to be released should the US or another government attempt to plug up the leaks.

Snowden “has taken extreme precautions to make sure many different people around the world have these archives to insure the stories will inevitably be published,” Greenwald told the Daily Beast last month.

“[I]f anything happens at all to Edward Snowden, he told me he has arranged for them to get access to the full archives,” the journalist said.

In his letter to Humphrey, Snowden wrote, “You may rest easy knowing I cannot be coerced into revealing that information, even under torture.”

Although Humphrey’s sentiments aren’t exactly shared en masse in Washington, that isn’t to say the country at large disapproves of Snowden’s actions. A poll conducted by Quinnipiac University released earlier this month found that the majority of Americans perceive Snowden as a man who did the right thing by releasing documents about the NSA programs to the media.

The verdict that Snowden is not a traitor goes against almost the unified view of the nation’s political establishment,” Peter Brown, assistant director of Quinnipiac’s polling institute, said in a press release.

Humphrey, 72, served in the US Senate until 1990, after which point he attempted twice, unsuccessfully, to run for governor of New Hampshire

Za privatizacijo gre!

Nemški liberalec Wolfgang Klinz je ocenil, da je Čufer v krajšem nastopnem govoru prikazal Slovenije pozitivno. Toda: pravi položaj da je kritičen, pravzaprav alarmanten. Omenil je, da se o privatizaciji le veliko govori in da je v javnem sektorju veliko preveč zaposlenih. Ministra je vprašal, ali bo Slovenija zaprosila za pomoč iz kriznega sklada ESM. (Delo, 09. 07. 2013)

*  *  *

Nemški liberalec s svojim pokroviteljskim slogom pove vse o odnosih znotraj EU. Govori resnico, ko pove, da gre  zgolj za privatizacijo. Laže o  preveliki zaposlenosti v slovenskem javnem sektorju, ki je po vseh podatkih, tudi OECD-jevih,  primerljiv z primerljivimi članicami te organizacije. Slovenija mora nujno  pripraviti scenarij za izhod iz evrocone.


Tiskovna predstavnica State Departmenta Jen Psaki opozarja, da lahko vsaka država, ki bi dovolila prevoz, nastanitev in politični azil Edwardu Snowdnu, pričakuje spremembo odnosov z ameriškimi oblastmi.

Delo, 09.07. 2013

dr. Gorenak v DZ insajdersko o organizatorjih protetstov

Naslednja težava, ki jo imamo so demonstracije. Bom rekel mogoče malo več kot je za na javno sejo. Demonstracije so bile organizirane, sponzorirane, spodbujene,

20. TRAK: (SB)

(nadaljevanje) če želite, s strani posameznikov, ki so ljudi izrabili. Za temi posamezniki je stala leva politična opcija. To je de facto dejstvo. To kaže na to, tudi plačila kažejo na to, izvor plačil kaže na to. Ne morete me prepričati v neko dobronamernost, tistega, ki je bil eden od glavnih organizatorjev, to je gospoda Hanžka, naj vas spomnim, da ste ga nekoč postavili za varuha človekovih pravic, ki bi naj bil neka demokratična inštitucija, ja, zanimiva zadeva, vidimo ga na vseh demonstracijah, mogoče bi ga človek vprašal kaj je delal na drugi vseslovenski vstaji in kaj je vozil v svojem avtu.

Na noben način in še vedno trdim, da so bile demonstracije, tako kot sem povedal, da so bili ljudje izkoriščeni s strani leve politične opcije posledi česar je, da ste prevzeli oblast. Torej, ni možno samo glasu kupiti (Rupar), ampak lahko to dosežeš tudi na drug način, recimo s kockami. To je problem. In to je metoda iz leta 1989 minus. V času, ko so se dogajale demonstracije nismo višali davkov, nismo prodajali nobenega državnega premoženja, nismo nižali pokojnin, nismo nižali plač, nismo nižali socialnih transferjev in nismo nižali porodniškega dopusta. Vse našteto ta vlada počne. Kje so danes organizatorji, ki so se baje borili proti vsem elitam, med drugim pa nosili napis Janković – kako že – “baraba radi te imamo”, nekaj takšnega je bilo napisano na transparentu? Torej, vi lahko manipulirate s tem kako so bile tiste demonstracije proti vsem elitam in tako dalje, ne, izvor je tak kakršen sem povedal in nič drugega, metode pa tiste izpred leta 1990. Ne nazadnje je treba reči še nekaj o demonstracijah 10, o čemer je tudi ena od vaju govorila, ne vem več katera, mislim, da gospa Potrata. Demonstracije leta 2010, ki jih je organizirala Študentska organizacija, so bile neoporečne, izvedene po zakonu in čisto nič drugače, izvedene po zakonu, še smetarje so plačali. Vzporedno so se pa dogajale neke druge demonstracije, ki jih je organiziral levi politični aktivist, ki je bil tudi zdaj aktiven, profesor s FDV-ja gospod Kurnik, ki pa je na nezakonit način izvedel neprijavljene demonstracije. On je imel priglasitev za filozofsko fakulteto in konec. In na noben način in pol ure pred prihodom Študentske organizacije in gospe Šoba pred parlament, so padle prve kocke, kar lahko vidite v poročilih Sintala. Torej, nimate nobene pravice očitati gospe Šoba, da je kandidirala na kakšni naši listi. Nasprotno, na vaših listah je ogromno takšnih ljudi, to pa drži.

Novih sto dni po diktatu Bruslja in z dodatnim zategovanjem pasu

Katja Svenšek, Blaž Petkovič

Če­prav je vlada Alenke Bra­tu­šek na­da­lje­vala delo, ki ga je pred­ča­sno kon­čala mi­ni­str­ska ekipa Ja­neza Janše, se ji vstaj­niki (še) niso po­sta­vili po robu. A kot na­po­ve­du­jejo ne­ka­teri, bo že je­seni dru­gače, če bo vlada svoje na­pore še na­prej usmer­jala pred­vsem v to, da po­miri Bru­selj.

Pr­vih sto dni vlade Alenke Bra­tu­šek je mi­nilo brez ve­čjih pro­te­stov, ki smo jim bili priče v času vlade Ja­neza Janše. Pa bo tako tudi v pri­ho­dnjih sto­tih dneh? Vlada svoje na­pore usmerja pred­vsem v to, da po­miri Bru­selj, manj v to, da po­miri dr­ža­vljane, med­tem ko fi­nanč­nih tr­gov za zdaj oči­tno ne po­miri nič.

Socialni transferji se znižujejo Po­li­tika se je po­e­no­tila okoli fi­skal­nega pra­vila, ome­jila re­fe­ren­dum­sko od­lo­ča­nje, tudi z do­go­vo­rom s sin­di­kati jav­nega sek­torja zni­žala javno po­rabo in dala ze­leno luč pr­vemu pri­va­ti­za­cij­skemu pa­ketu, a zah­te­vani do­nosi na slo­ven­ske dr­žavne vre­dno­stne pa­pirje kljub temu vztra­jajo okoli sed­mih od­stot­kov. Za­dol­že­va­nje pod ta­kšnimi po­goji ni vzdr­žno, zato bo mo­rala vlada vlo­žiti pre­cej na­po­rov, da bodo Slo­ve­niji med­na­ro­dni trgi pri­pra­vljeni po­so­diti de­nar po obre­stnih me­rah, pri­mer­lji­vih s so­se­dnjimi dr­ža­vami, na pri­mer Ita­lijo.

V pri­ho­dnjih me­se­cih se bodo za­čeli ure­sni­če­vati ukrepi, ki jih je z na­me­nom jav­no­fi­nančne kon­so­li­da­cije na­po­ve­dala in evrop­ski ko­mi­siji oblju­bila vlada. Kot prvi tak ukrep se bo že v po­ne­de­ljek zvi­šal da­vek na do­dano vre­dnost, s ka­te­rim naj bi po pri­ča­ko­va­njih vlade dr­ža­vljani k jav­no­fi­nančni kon­so­li­da­ciji pri­spe­vali do­da­tnih 250 mi­li­jo­nov evrov. Že do konca ju­lija naj bi dr­žava na drugi strani za do­ka­pi­ta­li­za­cije bank na­me­nila 900 mi­li­jo­nov evrov, če se le ne bo po opra­vlje­nem ne­od­vi­snem pre­gledu ka­ko­vo­sti ban­čnega sis­tema iz­ka­zalo, da je na­čr­to­van zne­sek pre­ni­zek. Ali ima dr­žava v tem pri­meru re­zervni na­črt, ni ja­sno. So­ci­alni trans­ferji se med­tem še zni­žu­jejo, na­po­ve­du­jejo se novi davki, če za­sta­vljeni ci­lji ne bodo do­se­ženi, pa lahko s pri­ho­dnjim le­tom pri­ča­ku­jemo še tako ime­no­vani kri­zni da­vek. Ta bi dr­ža­vljane po­leg že na­čr­to­va­nega davka na ne­pre­mič­nine, za ka­te­rega bodo la­stniki ne­pre­mič­nin pri­spe­vali okoli 240 mi­li­jo­nov evrov, stal še do­da­tnih 300 mi­li­jo­nov. Do­se­da­nji po­datki ne vzbu­jajo op­ti­mizma.

Davčni prihodki strmo navzdol Davčni pri­hodki, ki jih za dr­žavni pro­ra­čun po­bira Davčna uprava RS (Durs), so se v pr­vih treh me­se­cih le­to­šnjega leta v pri­mer­javi z ena­kim ob­do­b­jem lani zni­žali kar za de­vet od­stot­kov, raz­kri­vajo po­datki, ki smo jih vče­raj pri­do­bili na Dursu. Če je Durs od ja­nu­arja do konca marca lani po­bral sku­pno za 2,6 mi­li­jarde evrov davč­nih pri­hod­kov, so ti v ena­kem ob­do­bju le­tos zna­šali le še 2,3 mi­li­jarde evrov in so tako na ravni pr­vega če­tr­tle­tja leta 2007.

V le­to­šnjem pr­vem tri­me­se­čju so se zni­žali prav vsi davčni pri­hodki, naj­bolj, za več kot 30 od­stot­kov da­vek od do­hodka prav­nih oseb. Pod­je­tja so tako v pr­vem če­tr­tle­tju vpla­čala le še za sla­bih 100 mi­li­jo­nov evrov davka od do­hodka prav­nih oseb, in če­prav bi se mo­rala davčna sto­pnja po­sto­pno zni­že­vati in leta 2015 do­seči cilj­nih 15 od­stot­kov, pre­dlaga vlada zdaj za­mr­zni­tev pri 17 od­stot­kih.

Močno, za 15 od­stot­kov, so se v pr­vem če­tr­tle­tju zni­žali tudi pri­hodki od davka na do­dano vre­dnost. Tak pa­dec davka, ki po­na­zarja po­tro­šnjo, je Slo­ve­nija na­za­dnje utr­pela v pr­vem če­tr­tle­tju leta 2009, ko pa se je v dr­žavno bla­gajno še ve­dno ste­klo več kot 480 mi­li­jo­nov evrov davka na do­dano vre­dnost. Od ja­nu­arja do marca le­tos ga je Durs po­bral za manj kot 440 mi­li­jo­nov evrov.

Med­tem ko je prvi mož Evrop­ske cen­tralne banke Ma­rio Dra­ghi vče­raj po­novno opo­zo­ril, naj se dr­žave manj za­na­šajo na zvi­še­va­nje dav­kov, ki za­re­žejo v raz­po­lo­žljive do­hodke, in na­re­dijo več pri struk­tur­nih re­for­mah, kot je na pri­mer po­koj­nin­ska re­forma, bodo slo­ven­ski po­tro­šniki že s po­ne­delj­kom pla­če­vali višje sto­pnje davka na do­dano vre­dnost. Splo­šna sto­pnja bo na­me­sto 20 zna­šala 22 od­stot­kov, zni­žana sto­pnja se bo zvi­šala z 8,5 na 9,5 od­stotka. S ci­ljem, da dr­žava dobi do­da­tne pro­ra­čun­ske pri­live, o če­mer si­cer šte­vilni eko­no­mi­sti dvo­mijo, vlada po mne­nju go­spo­dar­stva ogroža še ti­sta de­lovna me­sta, ki so krizo do­slej ne­kako pre­ži­vela. In ob koncu pri­ho­dnjih sto­tih dni vlade bo na Za­vod za za­po­slo­va­nje tako kot vsako leto ok­to­bra ro­malo še ne­kaj ti­soč štu­den­tov, vpra­ša­nje pa je, ka­tera de­lovna me­sta jim bo po­nu­dila vlada, ki za­tr­juje, da so mladi njena pred­no­stna na­loga. Pred­se­dnica vlade si­cer pri­ča­kuje, da jim bo de­lo­da­jalce uspelo pre­pri­čati, da bodo za­po­slo­vali mlade, z opro­sti­tvijo pla­čila so­ci­al­nih pri­spev­kov. Da samo de­narna po­li­tika ne more ustva­riti go­spo­dar­ske ra­sti, je vče­raj v Pa­rizu znova po­u­da­ril Dra­ghi, dr­ža­vam čla­ni­cam pa za vzdr­žno rast pri­po­ro­čil struk­turne ukrepe in po­ve­ča­nje kon­ku­renč­no­sti.

Mrak: Prednostne naloge vlade bo izpolnjevanje smernic komisije In kaj je mo­goče pri­ča­ko­vati v na­sle­dnjih sto­tih dneh vlade? »Smer­nice de­lo­va­nja te vlade so bile do­kaj ja­sno po­sta­vljene ne zgolj s pro­gra­mom, ki ga je obli­ko­vala sama, tem­več tudi s smer­ni­cami, ki smo jih pr­vič v času sa­mo­stojne Slo­ve­nije do­bili za­pi­sane s strani zu­na­njih de­jav­ni­kov, v tem pri­meru od evrop­ske ko­mi­sije. Iz­pol­nje­va­nje teh smer­nic bo de­jan­sko pred­sta­vljalo ključne pred­no­stne na­loge vlade v na­sle­dnjih me­se­cih,« na­po­ve­duje dr. Moj­mir Mrak z lju­bljan­ske eko­nom­ske fa­kul­tete.

»Že do konca ju­nija naj bi se za­čel pro­ces oce­nje­va­nja por­t­fe­lja s strani med­na­ro­dno pri­znane tuje usta­nove, sami pa smo se ob­ve­zali, da bomo v tem času na slabo banko že pre­ne­sli tudi prve slabe ter­ja­tve. Ob­ču­tek imam, da je vlada na tem po­dro­čju celo ne­ko­liko hi­trejša od pri­ča­ko­vanj evrop­ske ko­mi­sije, od ka­tere že kar ne­kaj časa ča­kamo na ze­leno luč, s ka­tero bi lahko ta pre­nos ste­kel s polno di­na­miko. Osebno bi si že­lel več ko­rek­tno­sti in ek­s­pe­di­tiv­no­sti evrop­ske ko­mi­sije na tem za Slo­ve­nijo ključ­nem po­dro­čju,« do­daja Mrak. Na­sle­dnja ključna stvar za pri­ho­dnje me­sece, pri ka­teri pa že re­sno za­mu­jamo, je po Mra­ko­vem mne­nju pri­prava pro­gram­skih do­ku­men­tov za čr­pa­nje sred­stev pro­ra­čuna Evrop­ske unije v na­sle­dnjih me­se­cih. »To vpra­ša­nje je po­membno za pri­ho­dnost Slo­ve­nije, ne si­cer v nje­nih na­sle­dnjih sto­tih dne­vih, tem­več v na­sle­dnjem de­se­tle­tju. Treba se je na­mreč za­ve­dati, da bodo evrop­ska sred­stva v na­sle­dnjih le­tih re­la­tivno bi­stveno bolj po­membna, kot so bila v pre­te­klih le­tih, in to za­radi pre­pro­stega dej­stva, da dru­gih vi­rov sred­stev pre­pro­sto ne bo na vo­ljo,« opo­zarja Mrak.

Dr. Pe­ter Kra­ljič, ki je z do­se­da­njim de­lom vlade si­cer za­do­vo­ljen, na­po­ve­duje, da lahko dr­ža­vljani v pri­ho­dnjih me­se­cih pri­ča­ku­jejo na­da­lje­va­nje se­da­nje po­li­tike. »Me­nim pa, da mo­ramo še bolj za­te­gniti pa­sove, ker je Slo­ve­nija v pri­mer­javi z osta­limi dr­ža­vami manj na­re­dila na zni­ža­nju stro­škov, pred­vsem v javni upravi. Slo­venci smo ži­veli čez svoje zmo­žno­sti,« je de­jal Kra­ljič. »Lju­dem je po­trebno ja­sno po­ve­dati, kaj bo po­trebno na­re­diti, da ne bodo pri­ča­ko­vali ču­de­žev. V sto­tih dneh ne mo­rete obr­niti ladje, ki je 20 let vo­zila v na­pačno smer,« je do­dal. Kra­ljič si­cer opo­zarja, da bo treba več na­re­diti na kon­ku­renč­no­sti, pred­vsem pa po­spe­šiti go­spo­dar­sko rast, brez ka­tere ne bomo pri­šli ni­ka­mor. Če bodo se­daj res do­da­tno fi­nan­ci­rali mala in sre­dnja pod­je­tja, ki so no­silci na­šega iz­voza, je to pra­vilna od­lo­či­tev. Po­leg že za­sta­vlje­nih re­form mo­rajo biti se­daj pri­o­ri­teta do­da­tni ukrepi, s ka­te­rimi bi dvi­gnili kon­ku­renč­nost,« pravi Kra­ljič.

Na ulicah se medtem očitno obeta pestra jesen Pred­se­dnica vlade med­tem za­tr­juje, da v le­to­šnjem letu do­da­tnih ukre­pov, za­radi ka­te­rih bi mo­rali dr­ža­vljani za­te­gniti pas, ne bo. »Za­čeli se bomo ukvar­jati s pro­jek­ci­jami za na­sle­dnja leta. Ta­krat bomo vi­deli, ko­liko in na ka­te­rih po­dro­čjih bodo ukrepi še po­trebni,« je po­ja­snila pre­mi­erka.

Kar je nek­da­nji pred­se­dnik dr­žav­nega zbora Pa­vel Gan­tar na­po­ve­dal ko­nec le­to­šnjega fe­bru­arja, ko je Alenka Bra­tu­šek pre­vzela va­jeti za se­stavo nove vlade, se po­časi ure­sni­čuje. Da nova mi­ni­str­ska ekipa ne bo imela dru­gač­nih pri­o­ri­tet, kot jih je imela vlada Ja­neza Janše, je po sto­tih dneh od pre­vzema obla­sti že ja­sno, po tor­kovi vse­slo­ven­ski ljud­ski vstaji v pod­poro jav­nemu zdra­vstvu pa po­staja vse bolj oči­tno, da se bodo za­čela pro­te­stni­ška gi­ba­nja v na­sle­dnjih me­se­cih za­radi so­ci­al­nih raz­mer v dr­žavi kre­piti.

»Ak­tu­alna vlada je na eni strani uspela umi­riti sta­nje ide­o­lo­ške vojne, na drugi strani pa iz­vaja po­li­tiko njene pred­ho­dnice. Za­suk je bil naj­bolj opa­zen pri vpra­ša­nju fi­skal­nega pra­vila,« pr­vih sto dni po padcu Jan­ševe vlade ko­men­tira Gan­tar. Če od­mi­slimo po­ro­čilo o do­mnev­nem pla­gi­a­tor­stvu Alenke Bra­tu­šek in mne­nje pro­ti­ko­rup­cij­ske ko­mi­sije glede vo­zov­nic Gre­gorja Vi­ranta, bo ak­tu­alna mi­ni­str­ska ekipa po nje­go­vih be­se­dah si­cer pre­ži­vela to leto. »Nas pa na­sle­dnje leto ča­kajo dvojne vo­li­tve, evrop­ske in lo­kalne. Ver­je­tnost, da se bo eno iz­med teh gla­so­vanj upo­ra­bilo tudi za dr­žav­nozbor­ske vo­li­tve, ob­staja. To ni za­dnja vlada, ki jo bo pri­za­dela kriza,« na­po­ve­duje Gan­tar.

Vstaj­nik Uroš Lu­bej ob tem do­daja, da sta Alenka Bra­tu­šek in njen naj­po­memb­nejši ko­a­li­cij­ski par­tner Igor Lukšič raz­bila ti­ste za­dnje ilu­zije, ki so jih ne­ka­teri imeli o tem, da zno­traj ka­ste ob­sto­je­čih po­li­ti­kov ob­sta­jajo sile, ki so spo­sobne Slo­ve­nijo iz­tr­gati iz uni­ču­jo­čega ne­o­li­be­ral­nega toka, v ka­te­rem pluje Evropa in ki hoče po­ko­pati še za­dnje ostanke dr­žave bla­gi­nje, ki smo jo gra­dili de­se­tle­tja. »Po­ka­zala sta, kako je mo­goče v samo sto­tih dneh vla­da­nja – ali, bo­lje re­čeno, hlap­če­va­nja Bru­slju – ogo­lju­fati svoje vo­lilce s tem, ko rav­nata v po­pol­nem na­spro­tju z vsem, kar sta za­go­var­jala še pred ne­kaj me­seci. So­ci­alna na­spro­tja se bodo za­radi tega po­ve­če­vala, tako da ob­staja do­volj ve­lika ver­je­tnost, da bo je­seni pri­šlo do no­vega pro­te­stnega vala,« po­u­darja Lu­bej.

Po­dob­nega mne­nja je tudi Gan­tar: »Ven­dar pro­te­sti ne bodo imeli več to­li­kšne mo­ralno-po­li­tične ko­no­ta­cije, kot so jo imeli do se­daj, tem­več se bodo raz­vi­jali za­radi naj­ra­zlič­nej­ših so­ci­al­nih stisk. Pro­te­sti bodo s tem do­bili so­ci­alno-ra­zre­dni zna­čaj.«